Perforation of the uterus with a Mirena IUS
Toni requested that a Mirena coil be fitted for contraception, but the insertion procedure was very uncomfortable and she complained of severe pelvic pain for several weeks. Her GP did not recognise the problem and there was a considerable delay in starting the investigations. An ultrasound scan showed that the coil was not located in the uterus, but there was further delay in performing an x-ray, which showed that it was in the abdominal cavity.
She required a laparoscopic procedure to find and remove the device.
The PMS report noted that the claimant stated that she was not advised about the risk of perforation, although this was clearly written in the medical records. The main breach of duty was the delay in recognising the symptoms of perforation and investigating the problem in a timely manner. Toni received a settlement in view of the pain that she suffered for three months, as well as the need to undergo an operation to remove the device.


